What is ARCN doing about tomato scarcity?
Before you start reading, try to
recollect your experience the first time you went to buy tomatoes in the
Nigerian market and discovered how expensive they had become. If you
are not the market-going type, recall the first time you came first to
first with the reality that tomato is now a “scarce commodity”.
Was it a sweet or bitter experience? Did
you get a jolt when you were given three or four pieces of tomatoes for
N500? Did you smile and pay, or did you shrug and pray: “God deliver my
country”?
Or did you ask the harassed market woman that offered you the scarce vegetables, “Why?!”
Or did you scream the same question at your wife, house help, chef, or child?
I ask these questions because we are
always looking at the wrong places for solutions. And we also have a
penchant for looking for the wrong fellow to crucify. The average
Nigerian will call for the head of President Buhari and the All
Progressives Congress, and then pray that God intervenes in the tomato
scarcity.
But in saner climes, the people will
call for relevant specific public officers to properly analyse the
situation, and clearly give the country a road map for recovery. They
will ask questions concerning the quality of stewardship these officials
had rendered to the country, because it is under their watch that the
nation is witnessing the emergency. And these officers must give
account.
That is the time public officials, who
are not competent to chart a course for remedy, resign. They give way
for other leaders to apply their know-how, and save the nation.
I say this because as you read this
piece, the remaining tomatoes in many of the country’s tomato farms are
reportedly suffering from an onslaught of tomato blight, which
definitely will worsen the scarcity we are presently experiencing.
Instead of calling for the head of the
President and raving for divine intervention, this is the time for
Nigerians to appraise our agricultural research system. What have the
agricultural research institutes been doing all these years?
How have they spent the funds voted for
agric research year in and year out? To what extent did they prepare for
tomato disease outbreak? What better species of tomato do they have in
their labs? Any extracts as found in Kenya? How effective are their
extension services to the farmers? Who is in charge of the country’s
agricultural research? Who are the people he/she works with, and how do
they operate?
I believe this is the time we should
beam our searchlight on the sub-sector because in reality there is
almost no research going on in Nigeria. And without efficient and
professional research in the agricultural sector, the present
government’s swank about economic diversification through agriculture
shall end up as mere political braggadocio.
In the past, I wrote about promoting
plant tissue culture as a private sector enterprise because I observed
that most government-owned laboratories were empty and sordid.
The Agricultural Research Council of
Nigeria is the agency saddled with the responsibility of supervising and
coordinating the research, training and extension activities of germane
agric research institutes in the country. Prof. Baba Yusuf Abubakar is
its Executive Secretary.
Recently, www.financialwatchngr.com
<http://www.financialwatchngr.com> published a story titled,
“N59bn agric research spent fails to lift farmers’ productivity”. The
report said that according to data from budgetary allocation to the
agricultural ministry, the research institutes got an average of N19.6bn
yearly in the last three years (2013 – 2015), yet low yield per hectare
was recorded by Nigerian farmers in most food and cash crops, thereby
throwing up questions around inefficiency, corruption and lack of
supervision.
Interestingly, the report published the
reaction of the ARCN boss to the situation. “We have a total of 13,000
staff members and 90 per cent of the yearly allocation goes into
salaries and emoluments. Only 10 per cent goes into research. This is
why the institutes have not been able to improve farmers’ output,” he
explained.
On the surface, this justification
sounds like standard government response to such inefficiency concerns.
Everybody knows Nigeria is encumbered with recurrent expenses with
nothing to show for innovations and developmental infrastructure. But a
little scratch reveals that the problem with the system goes beyond
funds.
Granted, our research institutes may be
bloated; but there are indications that perhaps the best staff is not
put in the right positions to deliver the best. And, the leader at the
helm has not been as professional as he should be in making appointments
to the many research organs under his agency.
In other words, judging from complaints
from various stakeholders and news reports I had read, the Professor had
given more priority to appointments than research work.
I saw the red flag when the Minister of
Agriculture and Rural Development, Chief Audu Ogbeh, reversed all
appointments and postings made by Abubakar. Why should everything be
about appointments?, I asked. Even in a research system people still
peddle office positions?
My concern is that WAAPP is strategic to
Nigeria’s agricultural growth and should not be meddled with. In the
last five years, the programme had operated in the West Africa
sub-region contributing to increased agriculture productivity by
strengthening enabling conditions for sub-regional cooperation in
technology generation, dissemination and adoption. The programme under
its first phase had succeeded in making fish farming not only lucrative
but accessible to thousands of youths and women across the country.
Nigeria’s domestic demand for fish is
about three million tonnes but not even up to half of this is met with
the domestic supply. The gap is bridged through the importation of fish
which is unhealthy for our economic growth and self-reliance as a
nation. Hence one of the core objectives of WAAPP-Nigeria is to ensure
increase in fish production by developing and releasing top-notch
technologies in aquaculture for adoption in Nigeria and the ECOWAS
countries to increase productivity.
All over the world research institutes
are run with the best brains and most competent hands. So, there has to
be a mechanism to mop up fresh brains from tertiary institutions in the
country, and to mainstream a staff motivation model that will bring out
the best in scientists and researchers.
Government must wake up to the reality
that with a changing climate, our crops must be climate-resilient and
our farming methods climate-smart. We can only achieve these through
intensive research. For us not to fall into another tragedy similar to
today’s tomato scarcity we must do the needful.
In other countries, there is always news
about contributions of agricultural research to their development, but
in Nigeria one cannot remember the last time a research from any of the
institutes supervised by ARCN made headlines. This is the more reason
why Nigerians should ask them to explain their work on tomatoes and what
they plan to do about the blightSOURCE: PUNCH NEWSPAPER